
Both subjective and objective evaluation of diabetic macular edema (DME) can produce good results. In a recent study, the initial results of objective evaluation with retinal imaging technology (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Retina Module, Heidelberg Engineering) showed good sensitivity and moderate specificity, whereas subjective evaluation by two expert assessors produced high sensitivity and specificity. Nevertheless, with optimization, the results of the two forms of evaluation became more evenly matched, suggesting that the retinal imaging technology can aid clinicians in detecting DME.