Article

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome technology debate continues

Femtosecond laser technology (IntraLase Corp.) for LASIK flap creation certainly offers some distinct advantages over mechanical microkeratomes, according to its proponent, Perry S. Binder, MD, University of California-San Diego School of Medicine. However, surgeons still have to weigh the advantages versus the ?significant disadvantages? of the femtosecond laser technology, which is the cost of the device and increased time per procedure, noted Helen Wu, MD, New England Eye Center, Boston.

Chicago-Femtosecond laser technology (IntraLase Corp.) for LASIK flap creation certainly offers some distinct advantages over mechanical microkeratomes, according to its proponent, Perry S. Binder, MD, University of California-San Diego School of Medicine. However, surgeons still have to weigh the advantages versus the “significant disadvantages” of the femtosecond laser technology, which is the cost of the device and increased time per procedure, noted Helen Wu, MD, New England Eye Center, Boston.

Drs. Binder and Wu outlined their arguments for and against the femtosecond laser technology during a symposium entitled “Controversial procedures in refractive surgery: Do they have a place in our future?” on Monday afternoon at the American Academy of Ophthalmology annual meeting.

The compelling arguments in favor of adoption of femtosecond laser technology include:

• Predictable flap thickness with small standard deviation.

• Programmed hinge diameter.

• A more stable flap with fewer induced higher-order aberrations.

• A smooth stromal bed.

• Lower risk of traditional flap complications.

• Improved visual outcomes early.

• More fibrosis at the edge of the flap for a more secure flap.

While the positive points of femtosecond laser technology were acknowledged by Dr. Wu, she discussed the significant cost of purchasing the device and the increased cost that must be passed onto the patient. She also noted that the creation of a flap with this newer technology does increase the time of the surgery by about 20 minutes. The technology can create an opaque bubble layer that must clear before proceeding with the ablation, she noted.

Some patients have also experienced transient light sensitivity following the procedure with the femtosecond laser technology, although Dr. Binder noted that this could be reversed easily with topical steroid treatment.

After hearing the pros and cons, audience members were asked the question: “Should we use femtosecond laser technology to make flaps?” The majority (64%) replied no in an electronic vote.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Dilsher Dhoot, MD, on the evolution of geographic atrophy therapy: where are we now?
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times Europe) Anat Loewenstein, MD, shares insights on the real-world results of remote retinal imaging
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Two-wavelength autofluorescence for macular xanthophyll carotenoids with Christine Curcio, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) FLIO and the brain: Making the invisible visible with Robert Sergott, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Structure-function correlates using high-res OCT images with Karl Csaky, MD, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) SriniVas Sadda, MD, on high-res OCT of atrophic and precursor lesions in AMD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Christine Curcio, PhD, shares histology update supporting review software and revised nomenclature for <3 μm OCT
1 expert is featured in this series.
1 expert is featured in this series.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.