Article

Comparative study supports use of femtosecond laser for inserts channel creation

Implantation of micro-thin prescription inserts (Intacs, Addition Technology) in eyes with keratoconus appears to result in better refractive and visual outcomes when the femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS, IntraLase) is used for channel creation instead of a mechanical device, said Yaron Rabinowitz, MD, at the refractive surgery subspecialty day meeting sponsored by the International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Chicago-Implantation of micro-thin prescription inserts (Intacs, Addition Technology) in eyes with keratoconus appears to result in better refractive and visual outcomes when the femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS, IntraLase) is used for channel creation instead of a mechanical device, said Yaron Rabinowitz, MD, at the refractive surgery subspecialty day meeting sponsored by the International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Dr. Rabinowitz compared results from 6 months of follow-up in a group of 20 eyes that underwent surgery using the femtosecond laser for channel creation with 1-year data from a series of 10 eyes that had the channels created with a mechanical spreader. There was a slight advantage for the mechanical device group versus the femtosecond laser group for greater reduction in average K readings, 2.51 versus 2.37 D.

However, mean SE improved by 3.27 D in the femtosecond laser group versus only 2.57 D in the mechanical device group, uncorrected visual acuity improved 3.72 lines in the femtosecond laser group compared with 3.6 lines in the mechanical device group, and most dramatically, best-corrected visual acuity improved by 3.54 lines in eyes with femtosecond laser-created channels versus a gain of 1.75 lines in the mechanical device group. At 6 months, 85% of the patients were contact lens- or glasses-tolerant in the femtosecond laser group versus 70% in the mechanical group.

 “Certainty of depth of placement is a big advantage using the femtosecond laser and it is also very friendly to the patients and surgeon. Now, further follow-up is needed to determine how the outcomes of the femtosecond laser procedure compare at 12 months with the mechanical technique,” said Dr. Rabinowitz, director of ophthalmology research, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times)  ASCRS 2025: Joaquin De Rojas, MD, leverages machine learning model to predict arcuate outcomes
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: AnnMarie Hipsley, DPT, PhD, presents VESA for biomechanical simulation of presbyopia progression
Shehzad Batliwala, DO, aka Dr. Shehz, discussed humanitarian ophthalmology and performing refractive surgery in low-resource, high-risk areas at the ASCRS Foundation Symposium.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Advancing vitreous care with Inder Paul Singh, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The Residency Report: Study provides new insights into USH2A target end points
Lisa Nijm, MD, says preoperative osmolarity testing can manage patient expectations and improve surgical results at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
At the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting, Weijie Violet Lin, MD, ABO, shares highlights from a 5-year review of cross-linking complications
Maanasa Indaram, MD, is the medical director of the pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus division at University of California San Francisco, and spoke about corneal crosslinking (CXL) at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Taylor Strange, DO, assesses early visual outcomes with femto-created arcuate incisions in premium IOL cases
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, shares her early clinical experience with the Unity VCS system
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.