Article

Comparative study supports use of femtosecond laser for inserts channel creation

Implantation of micro-thin prescription inserts (Intacs, Addition Technology) in eyes with keratoconus appears to result in better refractive and visual outcomes when the femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS, IntraLase) is used for channel creation instead of a mechanical device, said Yaron Rabinowitz, MD, at the refractive surgery subspecialty day meeting sponsored by the International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Chicago-Implantation of micro-thin prescription inserts (Intacs, Addition Technology) in eyes with keratoconus appears to result in better refractive and visual outcomes when the femtosecond laser (IntraLase FS, IntraLase) is used for channel creation instead of a mechanical device, said Yaron Rabinowitz, MD, at the refractive surgery subspecialty day meeting sponsored by the International Society of Refractive Surgery of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Dr. Rabinowitz compared results from 6 months of follow-up in a group of 20 eyes that underwent surgery using the femtosecond laser for channel creation with 1-year data from a series of 10 eyes that had the channels created with a mechanical spreader. There was a slight advantage for the mechanical device group versus the femtosecond laser group for greater reduction in average K readings, 2.51 versus 2.37 D.

However, mean SE improved by 3.27 D in the femtosecond laser group versus only 2.57 D in the mechanical device group, uncorrected visual acuity improved 3.72 lines in the femtosecond laser group compared with 3.6 lines in the mechanical device group, and most dramatically, best-corrected visual acuity improved by 3.54 lines in eyes with femtosecond laser-created channels versus a gain of 1.75 lines in the mechanical device group. At 6 months, 85% of the patients were contact lens- or glasses-tolerant in the femtosecond laser group versus 70% in the mechanical group.

 “Certainty of depth of placement is a big advantage using the femtosecond laser and it is also very friendly to the patients and surgeon. Now, further follow-up is needed to determine how the outcomes of the femtosecond laser procedure compare at 12 months with the mechanical technique,” said Dr. Rabinowitz, director of ophthalmology research, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Dilsher Dhoot, MD, on the evolution of geographic atrophy therapy: where are we now?
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times Europe) Anat Loewenstein, MD, shares insights on the real-world results of remote retinal imaging
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Two-wavelength autofluorescence for macular xanthophyll carotenoids with Christine Curcio, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) FLIO and the brain: Making the invisible visible with Robert Sergott, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Structure-function correlates using high-res OCT images with Karl Csaky, MD, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) SriniVas Sadda, MD, on high-res OCT of atrophic and precursor lesions in AMD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Christine Curcio, PhD, shares histology update supporting review software and revised nomenclature for <3 μm OCT
1 expert is featured in this series.
1 expert is featured in this series.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.