Cascade Prodrug and Uneedle are partnering to test suprachoroidal delivery of CPD100 using Uneedle's Bella-Vue microneedle system for treating wet AMD.
For retina specialists managing an anti-VEGF treatment landscape defined by chronic injection burden, the announcement signals early-stage movement toward a mechanistically distinct, delivery-route-differentiated approach to wet AMD.
Note: This is a preclinical development update, not a clinical efficacy readout: CPD100 has not yet entered human testing, and no peer-reviewed data on the compound have been published.
Development and regulatory overview
According to the companies, Cascade's preclinical proof-of-concept program combining CPD100 with Bella-Vue delivery is already underway, with a goal of completing that work and supporting an initial INTERACT (INitial Targeted Engagement for Regulatory Advice on CBER/CDER producTs) meeting with the FDA in the fourth quarter of 2026.¹ Cascade said it is also pursuing funding to complete chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) work and nonclinical Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)–enabling studies needed to support an eventual Investigational New Drug (IND) application.¹
According to the release, the supporting preclinical rationale comes from in vitro work showing that low concentrations of CPD100 induced cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in endothelial cells under hypoxic conditions while sparing retinal cell viability—an effect the companies say supports a targeted anti-angiogenic mechanism confined to hypoxic macular tissue.¹
Uneedle plans to present the collaboration and initial development progress publicly for the first time at the OIS 9th Retina Innovation Summit in Montreal on July 14, 2026.¹
Clinical context
Wet AMD remains a leading cause of severe vision loss in older adults, and intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy has been the standard of care for roughly two decades.² Despite substantial gains in vision preservation, the regimen imposes a well-documented burden: many patients require injections as frequently as every 4 to 8 weeks for years, and real-world registry data show a majority still need dosing intervals short enough to strain adherence and clinic capacity.²,³ Surveys of retina specialists have repeatedly identified reduced treatment burden and longer-acting or sustained-delivery options as the field's top unmet needs.² Suboptimal adherence has, in turn, been linked to inferior visual outcomes.⁴