Article

Variables in models can provide invaluable insights to disease

There is value in studying a model of human disease that is not a carbon copy, said Jayakrishna Ambati, MD, associate professor, School of Medicine, and vice chairman, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

There is value in studying a model of human disease that is not a carbon copy, said Jayakrishna Ambati, MD, associate professor, School of Medicine, and vice chairman, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

Dr. Ambati defended animal models of age-related macular degeneration despite differences in eye structure and disease development between humans and other species often used in testing, such as primates, mice, and rabbits.

"Even imperfect models can provide invaluable insights," he said.

The validity of an animal model can be measured by several variables: face validity, or how well it copies the human condition; whether it obeys the genetic aspects of the disease; and how well it parallels the immunologic and pathogenetic mechanisms.

"This betrays the clinician's bias, but what is most important is how well it tells us something we didn't already know," Dr. Ambati said. "What does it predict, either about mechanisms or about treatment or diagnosis? Does it ultimately reveal some novel insights?"

He added that there is no single best choice of a model but that ongoing dialogue between basic scientists and clinical investigators will continue to lead to new discoveries.

He added that although mice lack maculas, several important insights have been gained from mouse models recently on issues such as development of choroidal neovascularization via substances found in drusen.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Mark Lobanoff, MD, on making the move to office-based surgery
Barsha Lal, PhD, discusses the way low dose atropine affects accommodative amplitude and dynamics at the 2025 ARVO meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: When eye findings should prompt neuroimaging in suspected neuro-Behcet disease
At the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) meeting, Katherine Talcott, MD, a retina specialist at Cleveland Clinic, shared her findings on EYP-1901 (EyePoint Pharmaceuticals) in the phase 2 DAVIO study.
Dr. Jogin Desai, founder of Eyestem Research, discusses his research at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Michael Rivers, MD, shares his takeaways as a panelist at the inaugural SightLine event
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Karl Stonecipher, MD, on LASIK outcomes using an aspheric excimer laser for high myopia
John Tan talks about an emergency triage framework for retinal artery occlusion at the 2025 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) meeting.
Dr Robert Maloney at the 2025 Controversies in Modern Eye Care meeting
Wendy Lee, MD, MS, at Controversies in Modern Eye Care 2025.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.