Article

The effects of unilateral congenital ptosis in a pediatric population

Author(s):

Clinicians discover the ptotic facial side of the face was the nondominant side of the face in a recent study.

The effects of unilateral congenital ptosis in a pediatric population

Investigators from the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and the University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine, Dallas, led by Phillip A. Tensel, MD, reported that in children with unilateral congenital ptosis, the ptotic facial side of the face was the nondominant side of the face. In addition, these patients also had ipsilateral head tilt.1

The clinicians conducted a retrospective review of pediatric patients with unilateral congenital ptosis who were undergoing ptosis repair in order to analyze their facial asymmetry. All patients were treated between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. The investigators collected the following data from the medical charts: sex, age, laterality, margin to reflex distance 1, levator function, and surgical intervention.

The investigators described that they used clear preoperative photos in which the patients’ heads were not turned. The landmarks of the periorbital region, midface, and lower face were marked, and measurements between the landmarks were taken. The measurements between the ptotic and non-ptotic sides were compared.

Results of analysis

A total of 44 patients were included in the study. Nine of the 44 underwent a Mullerectomy, 15 a levator resection, and 20 a frontalis suspension.

The measurements showed the following significant findings: the side of the face with blepharoptosis often had a smaller margin to reflex distance 1 (p < 0.001), a smaller margin to reflex distance 2 (p < 0.005),a smaller horizontal palpebral fissure (p < 0.05), a shorter midface heightp < 0.001), and a more inferiorly displaced lateral canthus (canthal angle, p < 0.001) compared with the side of the face without ptosis. The mean head tilt in the presence of ptosis on the right side (1.37° right tilt) differed significantly from when ptosis was on the left side (0.85° left tilt; p = 0.04), they reported.

The study concluded that in children with unilateral congenital ptosis, the side of the face with the ptosis was the nondominant side of the face. Patients also had ipsilateral head tilt.

Reference
  1. Tenzel PA, Brown K, Zhou B, et al. Facial asymmetry in children with unilateral congenital ptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; published online March 30, 2022; doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002174
Related Videos
EyeCon 2024: Adam Wenick, MD, talks about myopic interventions across the lifespan
Adam Wenick, MD, chairs EyeCon session: New treatments in geographic atrophy from detection to intervention
Arun Gulani, MD: How the Gni instrument enhances precision and control in cataract surgery
EyeCon 2024: Laura M. Periman, MD, shares her passion for dry eye disease, discussing her surprising discovery of the Alpenglow Sign in Demodex blepharitis
David Eichenbaum, MD, presents advances in AMD therapy, highlights different mechanisms with a common goal
Cochair Kelly K. Nichols, OD, PhD, MPH, FAAO, highlights her passion for dry eye research and the vital collaboration between ophthalmology and optometry
EyeCon 2024: Peter J. McDonnell, MD, marvels on mentoring, modern technology, and ophthalmology’s future
EyeCon Co-chair Oluwatosin U. Smith, MD: Passion for Research and Education Drives Her Commitment to Ophthalmology
Dr. SriniVas Sadda Discusses Vision for ARVO as New President: Collaboration, Funding Challenges, and Impact of Annual Meetings
Highlights from the 18th Annual Controversies in Modern Eye Care Symposium: Arjan Hura, MD, on Refractive Surgery, Retina Care, and Record Attendance
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.