Article

Results favor microcoaxial incision technique for limiting bacterial ingress

Results of a study performed in an animal model demonstrate that bimanual phacoemulsification wounds allow significantly greater bacterial ingress from the ocular surface compared with a microcoaxial incision, said Vaishali A. Vasavada, MS.

Results of a study performed in an animal model demonstrate that bimanual phacoemulsification wounds allow significantly greater bacterial ingress from the ocular surface compared with a microcoaxial incision, said Vaishali A. Vasavada, MS.

The investigation was performed by Dr. Vasavada and colleagues at the Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. The study included 20 rabbits that had the first eye randomized to undergo phacoemulsification (phaco) with bimanual or microcoaxial phaco and then underwent the alternate procedure in the fellow eye. Bimanual phaco was performed with a clear corneal 1.2-mm incision for the phaco tip and a 1.4-mm incision for the irrigating chopper; the microcoaxial technique involved a 2.2-mm incision.

After irrigation/aspiration, stromal hydration was performed for all wounds, a control aqueous aspirate was obtained, then a 0.5 ml suspension containing Staphylococcus epidermidis was instilled on the ocular surface. After waiting 2 minutes, a 0.1 ml aspirate of aqueous humor was withdrawn and sent for 24-hour culture and microbiological analysis of colony forming units of Staphylococcus epidermidis per 0.1 ml.

The results showed significantly higher contamination in the bimanual phaco eyes compared with the microcoaxial eyes. The significant difference remained in subgroup analyses considering only eyes that had no clinical evidence of wound distortion and in those judged to have distorted wounds.

"Our results are supported by a recent study that reported microincision coaxial phaco induces less wound stress and alteration of wound morphology than bimanual incisions," Dr. Vasavada said. "Nevertheless, we still found bacterial ingress in both study groups."

"The take-home message is, even with the smallest of clear, corneal incisions, wound integrity is crucial," Dr. Vasavada concluded. "Surgeons should always look for incision distortion at the end of the case and should not hesitate to suture if necessary."

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) CCOI's new CEO Malvina Eydelman, MD, outlines her mission and vision for the organization
CIME 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, on expanding options in pharmacological presbyopia management
At CIME 2025, Neda Shamie, MD, answers questions about Demodex blepharitis
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Deb Ristvedt, DO, on medications, lasers, and lifestyle in glaucoma management
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Mark Lobanoff, MD, on making the move to office-based surgery
Barsha Lal, PhD, discusses the way low dose atropine affects accommodative amplitude and dynamics at the 2025 ARVO meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: When eye findings should prompt neuroimaging in suspected neuro-Behcet disease
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.