• COVID-19
  • Biosimilars
  • Cataract Therapeutics
  • DME
  • Gene Therapy
  • Workplace
  • Ptosis
  • Optic Relief
  • Imaging
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • AMD
  • Presbyopia
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Practice Management
  • Pediatrics
  • Surgery
  • Therapeutics
  • Optometry
  • Retina
  • Cataract
  • Pharmacy
  • IOL
  • Dry Eye
  • Understanding Antibiotic Resistance
  • Refractive
  • Cornea
  • Glaucoma
  • OCT
  • Ocular Allergy
  • Clinical Diagnosis
  • Technology

Genetic analysis could predict myopia in children

Digital EditionOphthalmology Times: May 2020
Volume 45
Issue 8

myopia progression in children

Future research may lead to development of polygenic risk score that will enable clinicians to accurately predict myopia in children, obviating the need for cycloplegic autorefraction.

Clinicians may soon be able to use genetic information alone to determine the risk of myopia in very young children, according to researchers.

“A personalized medicine approach to detecting children at risk of myopia is now feasible, although currently the accuracy of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) is not yet good enough to warrant their use in clinical practice,” write Neema Ghorbani Mojarrad and colleagues at the University of Bradford in Bradford, UK. 

They published their findings in JAMA Ophthalmology (2020; 138Ci):7-13).

Today, the best predictor of children at risk of myopia is a low hyperopic refractive error at an age before myopia typically manifests, so clinicians seeking to evaluate risks of myopia in young children typically rely on a screening regimen of cycloplegic autorefraction.

Successfully predicting risks of myopia in children can help clinicians recommend lifestyle changes such as more time outdoors, which can help mitigate or prevent the development of myopia.

However, the use of cycloplegic autorefraction is time- and resource-intensive, so Mojarrad and his team wanted to see if they could develop a PRS for evaluating risk based purely on genetic information.

To develop their PRS, the researchers conducted three genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Data used for the GWASs included 287,448 UK Biobank participants who had not undergone autorefraction, and 95,619 UK Biobank participants who had undergone noncycloplegic autorefraction.

In addition, researchers collected data on 328,917 individuals whose information had originally been compiled to study the relationship between genes and years of educational attainment and was downloaded from the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium (SSGAC) website.

The researchers then combined their data in a meta-analysis in order to increase the effective sample size. They generated a PRS for each participant using genotypes for 1.1 million variants.

Researchers validated their PRS by using it to predict rates of myopia in 1,516 women whose genome data and known rates of myopia were obtained from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).

The PRS derived from the SSGAC GWAS provided limited predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.14% where R2 = 100% would be a completely accurate prediction). The autorefraction and non-autorefraction GWASs were also relatively inaccurate (R2 = 7.1% compared to R2 = 6.9%). 

The researchers were able to improve the accuracy of the PRS by combining sets of traits. The best result came from combining the autorefraction and non-autorefraction GWASs (R2 = 10.8%). Combining all three traits yielded even greater accuracy (R2 = 11.2%).

The GWAS was unable to produce a PRS that was as accurate as the results obtainable using cycloplegic autorefraction. Measured in terms of the under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), where 0.5 is a useless model and 1.0 is a perfect model, the PRS had an AUROC of 0.67 while the cycloplegic autorefraction had an AUC of 0.87.

While they were unable to develop a suitably accurate alternative to cycloplegic autorefraction for predicting rates of myopia, Mojarrad and his team were able to conclude from their study that children can be categorized into three groups based on the risk of developing myopia. Those with a PRS in the top 25% were at 3-fold to 5-fold higher risk of myopia, and those in the top 10% were at 3.5-fold to 6-fold increased risk, whereas those in the top 5% were at 4.5-fold to 6.5-fold higher risk.

Researchers are hopeful that this information will aid clinicians in recommending lifestyle interventions or prescribing orthokeratologic or atropine treatment

Mojarrad and his team are encouraged by the results of their study, and predict that future research may lead to the development of a PRS that will enable clinicians to accurately predict myopia in children, obviating the need for cycloplegic autorefraction.

Neema Ghorbani Mojarrad
P: +44 (0) 1274-232323
Mojarrad has no financial disclosures related to this content.

Related Videos
J. Peter Campbell, MD, MPH
Expanding accessibility of vision correction with spectacles for children with cranial abnormalities
Elkin: Talking about the importance of pediatric eye health and safety
Identifying 3 barriers keeping families from accessing cataract treatment for their children in India
Edward Manche, MD
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.