• COVID-19
  • Biosimilars
  • Cataract Therapeutics
  • DME
  • Gene Therapy
  • Workplace
  • Ptosis
  • Optic Relief
  • Imaging
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • AMD
  • Presbyopia
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Practice Management
  • Pediatrics
  • Surgery
  • Therapeutics
  • Optometry
  • Retina
  • Cataract
  • Pharmacy
  • IOL
  • Dry Eye
  • Understanding Antibiotic Resistance
  • Refractive
  • Cornea
  • Glaucoma
  • OCT
  • Ocular Allergy
  • Clinical Diagnosis
  • Technology

Fundus autofluorescence offers edge in white dot syndrome imaging


Subclinical lesions have been detected that are not apparent on other imaging platforms

retinal imaging

This article was reviewed by Phoebe Lin, MD, PhD

In many cases, a fundus examination will provide all the information a clinician needs to arrive at the correct diagnosis. In other cases, the situation is not that straightforward, and technology above and beyond fluorescein angiography or ophthalmoscopy is needed.

“Fundus autofluorescence [FAF] is particularly useful in the white dot syndromes because of the involvement of the outer retina and the retinal pigment epithelium,” according to Phoebe Lin, MD, PhD, associate professor of ophthalmology at Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, in Portland.

Reduced autofluorescence occurs in patients with white dot syndromes, Lin noted, when there is a decrease in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) lipofuscin density, loss of the RPE, and increased melanin content, subretinal fluid, fibrosis and scarring, or media opacities that block emission of the autofluorescence.

In contrast, increased autofluorescence in inflammatory conditions such as in white dot syndromes results from excessive RPE lipofuscin accumulation, fluorophores anterior or posterior to the RPE, macrophages containing lipofuscin, and choroidal vessels that contain and collagen and elastin under the RPE, she explained.

Lin described a case of relentless placoid chorioretinitis, which included increased autofluorescence (ie, hyperautofluorescence) and, therefore, active lesions.

On the fundus image, the atrophic and well-delineated lesions on the border were hypoautofluorescent, but the poorly delineated, nonatrophic lesions were hyperautofluorescent. Following treatment, all the lesions were atrophic with very distinct borders and all had decreased autofluorescence.

In contrast to that straightforward case, Lin pointed out, a great deal of subtle information can be gleaned from FAF. In the same patient with relentless placoid chorioretinitis, the correlation between the findings of FAF and a B-scan optical coherence tomography (OCT) image can be appreciated. 

Poorly delineated and moderately intense hyperautofluorescence was seen corresponding to an area of hyperreflectivity in the outer nuclear layer on the OCT image.

“This may suggest something infiltrative in front of the RPE such as a lipofuscin-containing macrophage that is not as intensely hyperautofluorescent as the lipofuscin in the RPE,” she explained.

Also visible was an area of decreased autofluorescence on the OCT image that corresponded to an area of increased transmission of signal through to the choroid. 

“This may indicate an area of RPE cell loss,” she noted.

This finding was adjacent to an intensely hyperautofluorescent lesion that is bordered by hypoautofluorescence, a jigsaw lesion with an intense hyperautofluorescent core corresponding to RPE irregularity and thickening on the OCT image that may represent increased lipofuscin within the RPE. Normal autofluorescence corresponds to normal or near-normal RPE on OCT.

Another area of decreased autofluorescence corresponded to increased transition on the OCT that may be RPE cell loss.

According to Lin, following the treatment of this particular patient with prednisone, azathioprine, and cyclosporine, an area of intense decreased autofluorescence corresponded to an area of thickened RPE.

“Examination showed that this area was pigmented, indicating increased melanin content that resulted in a reduced autofluorescence signal,” Lin said.

FAF imaging
In an image obtained from a 60-year-old Caucasian woman, Lin demonstrated a classic lesion emanating from the optic disc that was likely serpiginous choroiditis.

In such a case, FAF imaging clearly shows how the lesion spreads, and over time, the moderately intense areas of hyperautofluorescence correspond to the areas that evolve to normal autofluorescence as a result of aggressive treatment.

In contrast, areas of jigsaw lesions with very hyperintense hyperautofluorescence with hypoautofluorescent borders evolve to distinctly hypoautofluorescent lesions.

“This indicates that areas that are less intense may do well with treatment, in contrast to those with intense hyperautofluorescence that may not be reversible with treatment,” Lin explained.

Defining disease progression
FAF can also shed light on the degree and direction of disease progression. For example, acute zonal occult outer retinopathy may have 2 modes of spread—from the periphery inward and from the optic nerve outward, that can be seen on imaging.

In multifocal choroiditis, more lesions as well as the degree of disease progression over time can be seen on FAF much more easily than can be appreciated using fundus photography or fundus examination.

In a case of classic birdshot chorioretinopathy, the deep choroidal lesions are not visible on FAF, but in these cases, the higher prevalence of outer retinal lesions are visible on FAF.

“We recently published a series of patients in which about 50% had outer retinal lesions that are classic in this pathology, in addition to deep choroidal lesions,” Lin said. “The outer lesions can be followed on FAF.”

The 2 scanning laser ophthalmoscopy imaging devices used most often in clinical practice are the HRA Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering) with an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and the Ultra-widefield FAF device (Optos) with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. The former operates in the blue wavelength and the latter in the green wavelength, both of which may provide different information.

The take-home points regarding FAF imaging include that the lesion patterns seen on FAF may provide diagnostic clues.

The technology can demonstrate subclinical lesions that are not seen well on ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, or fluorescein angiography and is less invasive than angiography. The technology also can demonstrate the course of the disease, guide treatment, and show recurrences or treatment responses.

“In our practice, we order FAF in patients with posterior-involving uveitis early and often,” Lin concluded.

Phoebe Lin, MD, PhD
e: linp@ohsu.edu
Dr Lin has no financial interests related to this report.

Related Videos
CIME 2024: Neda Shamie, MD, reports on a morning session packed with refractive surgery options, retina, glaucoma, and a 'mite-y' Demodex discussion
Highlights from the 18th Annual Controversies in Modern Eye Care Symposium: Arjan Hura, MD, on Refractive Surgery, Retina Care, and Record Attendance
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.