• COVID-19
  • Biosimilars
  • Cataract Therapeutics
  • DME
  • Gene Therapy
  • Workplace
  • Ptosis
  • Optic Relief
  • Imaging
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • AMD
  • Presbyopia
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Practice Management
  • Pediatrics
  • Surgery
  • Therapeutics
  • Optometry
  • Retina
  • Cataract
  • Pharmacy
  • IOL
  • Dry Eye
  • Understanding Antibiotic Resistance
  • Refractive
  • Cornea
  • Glaucoma
  • OCT
  • Ocular Allergy
  • Clinical Diagnosis
  • Technology

ARVO 2024: Measuring meibomian gland morphology with increased accuracy


Pucker shares topline results from a study that investigated the difference in meibomobian gland morphology when measured with a Visante OCT versus an OCULUS Keratograph 5M

At ARVO 2024 in Seattle, Washington, Andrew D. Pucker, OD, PhD, presented data regarding meibomobian gland morphology when measured with a Visante OCT versus an OCULUS Keratograph 5M. Pucker, executive director of clinical and medical science at Lexitas Pharma Services Inc, share key takeaways from the study, which was also published in Contact Lens and Anterior Eye.

Video Transcript:

Editor's note: The below transcript has been lightly edited for clarity.

Andrew D. Pucker, OD, PhD:

Hello, my name is Andrew Pucker. I am the executive director of clinical and medical sciences at Lexitas Pharma services, and today I'm excited to talk about my recent paper that was published in Contact Lens and Anterior Eye.

In this study, what we did was we compared people who were analyzed with a Visante OCT, which has a long wavelength of light, which is around 310 nanometers, to people who were analyzed with an OCULUS Keratograph 5M, which has an 880 nanometer wavelength. So with these 2 instruments, what we did is we looked at their eyelids, we looked at their meibomian gland morphology, and what we found was that with the OCT, they had longer eyelid glands compared to the chronograph.

So why is that important? So about 3 or 4 years ago, I was reading in the literature, and I found that post-treatment, the meibomian glands got longer, which doesn't really make sense. Typically, we think of a gland once it's gone. It's atrophied. You can't get it back. But what happened is, there's several studies that found it was longer post-treatment. So what I think my data suggests is that on OCT, you can just image deeper into the eyelid and see these glands that are always there that are probably being missed with the Keratograph. So post-treatment, what might be happening is that the glands are becoming healthier, thicker, and become more visible on meibography, which is why there's being shown as longer post-treatments. So really, I think the glands are there. They're just not healthy. And what we can do now is use this technology to hopefully better design trials to see how treatment changes occur over time.

So the next step is, I think, to potentially optimize our existing meibographers. So the Keratograph 5M is just one example. That's what we used, but it has this shorter wavelength than the Vistante OCT, which is not used typically for analyzing the meibomian glands. So what we can potentially do is have manufacturers take this information, optimize the wavelengths, so maybe you're catching all the glands instead of just more the superficial gland.

Related Videos
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.