Article

Using hard words (or, if you prefer, complex verbiage)

Thanks to this research, I comprehend why some people insist they don’t find my columns to be particularly insightful or humorous. It’s not their fault. I blame myself. My writing is just too gosh-darned sophisticated.

A colleague of mine was recently preparing a document for inpatients and family members to read. Her hospital, she told me, mandates that all such documents be at a fifth-grade reading level. Her first draft, according to analysis by Microsoft Word, came out around grade 10. She reworked it to simplify the language and found it now to be at eighth-grade level. After a great deal of additional time, she finally got it down to 5.9, and left it there.

“It’s almost impossible to write about something substantive at a fifth-grade level,” she concluded.

Readability level

The Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability grade level was developed under contract to the U.S. Navy in 1975. The F-K formula was adopted by the U.S. Army for assessing the difficulty of technical manuals in 1978 and soon became the standard for the Department of Defense. Pennsylvania was the first state to require that automobile insurance policies be written at no higher than a ninth-grade level (14 to 15 years of age) of reading difficulty, as measured by the F-K formula. This requirement has been adopted by many other states and for other legal documents such as insurance policies.

 

Institutional review boards typically have a similar requirement for informed consent forms for clinical trials. But it can be very challenging to write at low grade levels. According to Wikipedia, by the criteria of readability tests like the F-K reading level, many Wikipedia articles are “too sophisticated” for their readers.1

It makes sense that written materials be intelligible to those who need to review and sign them, or who must follow the instructions therein to do their work. Rudolph Flesch, PhD, who worked for the Associated Press, is credited with reducing the difficulty of reading newspapers by several grade levels. A 1948 study in the Journalism Quarterly showed that lowering reading difficulty from the 13th grade to the sixth grade increased the number of paragraphs read by 93%.2 Supposedly, the typical newspaper is today written at an eighth-grade level.

 

At what grade level?

I had two questions:

  • What is my own reading grade level?

  • What is the F-K grade level of my editorials in Ophthalmology Times?

Adding up my years in grammar school (8), high school (3), college (3), medical school (4), and residency (3)-Note: I had no time to read during my internship-I logically conclude that I should be at a 21st-grade level. To find out if all those years of schooling are reflected in my writings, I checked a half dozen of my past editorials. The F-K grade level of a document can be determined using the Review function in Microsoft Word. What I discovered is that my editorials are consistently in the 12th- to 13th-grade range.

Until actually checking, I had assumed that my contributions to Ophthalmology Times were at a fairly low grade level. My intent was always that they be simple, and hopefully, humorous reads for my ophthalmologist colleagues, in contrast to the denser scientific articles elsewhere in this publication. By avoiding complicated words, like “Constantinople” and “anti-disestablishmentarianism,” I was hoping to keep things light.

 

Also, some of my family members and friends are orthopedic surgeons, and I don’t want them to be left behind. According to the F-K system, however, my writings are accessible to only a minority of Americans.

Thanks to this research, I comprehend why some people insist they don’t find my columns to be particularly insightful or humorous. It’s not their fault. I blame myself. My writing is just too gosh-darned sophisticated.

References

1.     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flesch%E2%80%93Kincaid_readability_tests

2.     http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/newsletter/plwork15.htm

 

 

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times)  ASCRS 2025: Joaquin De Rojas, MD, leverages machine learning model to predict arcuate outcomes
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: AnnMarie Hipsley, DPT, PhD, presents VESA for biomechanical simulation of presbyopia progression
Shehzad Batliwala, DO, aka Dr. Shehz, discussed humanitarian ophthalmology and performing refractive surgery in low-resource, high-risk areas at the ASCRS Foundation Symposium.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Advancing vitreous care with Inder Paul Singh, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The Residency Report: Study provides new insights into USH2A target end points
Lisa Nijm, MD, says preoperative osmolarity testing can manage patient expectations and improve surgical results at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
At the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting, Weijie Violet Lin, MD, ABO, shares highlights from a 5-year review of cross-linking complications
Maanasa Indaram, MD, is the medical director of the pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus division at University of California San Francisco, and spoke about corneal crosslinking (CXL) at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Taylor Strange, DO, assesses early visual outcomes with femto-created arcuate incisions in premium IOL cases
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, shares her early clinical experience with the Unity VCS system
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.