Article

Surface ablation procedures differ in terms of visual recovery, comfort

New York-Several options can be offered to refractive surgery patients who are candidates for surface ablation procedures, and those individuals should be informed about differences between procedures with respect to speed of visual rehabilitation and postoperative comfort, said Gary R. Fishman, MD.

New York-Several options can be offered to refractive surgery patients who are candidates for surface ablation procedures, and those individuals should be informed about differences between procedures with respect to speed of visual rehabilitation and postoperative comfort, said Gary R. Fishman, MD.

"For a variety of reasons, there has been a significant movement back to surface ablation over the past several years. However, when discussing surface treatment with refractive surgery candidates, we now have alternatives to offer instead of PRK," said Dr. Fishman, attending surgeon, New York Eye & Ear Infirmary, New York.

Two separate procedures

The study included two groups of 20 patients each undergoing bilateral surgery. In one group, patients had epi-LASIK performed in one eye and PRK contralaterally, and the second group underwent epiLASIK and LED in fellow eyes. Epithelial removal for PRK was performed by manual scraping. Epithelial flaps measuring 9.5 mm were created in the epi-LASIK and LED groups using the Amadeus II microkeratome (Advanced Medical Optics) set at an oscillation speed of 11,000 rpm, translation speed of 1.5 mm/sec, and suction of 22 mm Hg.

Patients returned for follow-up each day during the first week after surgery until the epithelial defect healed. At each visit, epithelial defect size was measured at the slit-lamp and recorded with digital photography.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times)  ASCRS 2025: Joaquin De Rojas, MD, leverages machine learning model to predict arcuate outcomes
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: AnnMarie Hipsley, DPT, PhD, presents VESA for biomechanical simulation of presbyopia progression
Shehzad Batliwala, DO, aka Dr. Shehz, discussed humanitarian ophthalmology and performing refractive surgery in low-resource, high-risk areas at the ASCRS Foundation Symposium.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Advancing vitreous care with Inder Paul Singh, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The Residency Report: Study provides new insights into USH2A target end points
Lisa Nijm, MD, says preoperative osmolarity testing can manage patient expectations and improve surgical results at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
At the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting, Weijie Violet Lin, MD, ABO, shares highlights from a 5-year review of cross-linking complications
Maanasa Indaram, MD, is the medical director of the pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus division at University of California San Francisco, and spoke about corneal crosslinking (CXL) at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Taylor Strange, DO, assesses early visual outcomes with femto-created arcuate incisions in premium IOL cases
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, shares her early clinical experience with the Unity VCS system
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.