Video

Study compares postoperative refractive accuracy of formula-modified keratometry values versus total keratometry values obtained by a swept-source OCT biometer with new-generation multivariable IOL calculation formulas

Author(s):

Older generation non-LVC formulas show marked improvement upon using TK values vs K, while multivariable non-LVC formulas did not consistently improve.

The study, “Comparison of Keratometry vs. Total Keratometry with Multivariable Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas in Post-Myopic Laser Vision Correction Eyes," presented by Jacob Rogers in collaboration with the Dean McGee Eye Institute, is a retrospective review of 130 eyes with previous M-LVC that were measured with SS-OCT biometer for K and TK prior to cataract surgery between 2019-2021.

"At this time, despite the potential advantages of TK measurements to incorporate posterior coral measurements, we recommend that surgeons utilize formulas customized for post-LVC eyes with traditional K values." - Jacob Rogers

Purpose of the study

  • To compare postoperative refractive accuracy of formula-modified keratometry (K) values versus total keratometry (TK) values obtained by a swept-source OCT biometer (IOL Master 700) with new-generation multivariable IOL calculation formulas
  • To assess whether TK values used with multivariable formulas help refractive accuracy in post M-LCV eyes, or whether using a formula dedicated for post M-LVC eyes with traditional K values yields improved refractive outcomes

Study conclusions

  • IOL calculation remains challenging in post-refractive eyes, as we continue to obtain refractive outcomes within +/-0.5D in only one half of eyes
  • Older generation non-LVC formulas show marked improvement upon using TK values vs K, while multivariable non-LVC formulas did not consistently improve
  • At this time, despite the potential advantages of TK measurements to incorporate posterior coral measurements, we recommend that surgeons utilize formulas customized for post-LVC eyes with traditional K values
  • Given the similarly positive outcomes, surgeons can utilize either K or TK values for the EVO-LVC and Barrett True K formulas

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
Lisa Nijm, MD, says preoperative osmolarity testing can manage patient expectations and improve surgical results at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
At the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting, Weijie Violet Lin, MD, ABO, shares highlights from a 5-year review of cross-linking complications
Maanasa Indaram, MD, is the medical director of the pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus division at University of California San Francisco, and spoke about corneal crosslinking (CXL) at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Taylor Strange, DO, assesses early visual outcomes with femto-created arcuate incisions in premium IOL cases
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, shares her early clinical experience with the Unity VCS system
Patricia Buehler, MD, MPH, founder and CEO of Osheru, talks about the Ziplyft device for noninvasive blepharoplasty at the 2025 American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ASCRS) annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Bonnie An Henderson, MD, on leveraging artificial intelligence in cataract refractive surgery
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Gregory Moloney, FRANZO, FRCSC, on rotational stability
Sheng Lim, MD, FRCOphth, discusses the CONCEPT study, which compared standalone cataract surgery to cataract surgery with ECP, at the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Steven J. Dell, MD, reports 24-month outcomes for shape-changing IOL
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.