Article

Protective eye gear essential for modern soldier

Preventing ocular injuries during war by using protective devices may reduce the incidence of these injuries, which currently hold the number four slot for highest incidence after amputation, traumatic brain injury, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Key Points

The meeting was sponsored by Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and Ophthalmology Times.

"What we learned about eye injuries was not just learned from the current war in Iraq but from several previous wars," said Dr. Ward, a private practitioner in West Hartford, CT, and former ophthalmology consultant to the U.S. Army's surgeon general. The percentage of ocular wounds received on the battlefield has increased steadily over the past century, from less than 1% during the Civil War to about 13% in the early phase of the war in Iraq, he added.

The eyes are so vulnerable, he explained, because they are preferentially exposed during combat, whereas the rest of the body, except for the limbs, is protected with armor.

In addition, the types of munitions used have changed over the past century. During the Civil War, if a soldier was hit by a cannonball or minnie ball, he likely would die, and ocular injuries were not an issue. Modern weapons, however, generate numerous fragments when they explode. "Modern hand grenades, for example, fragment into about 2,000 individual projectiles, and the eye is exceptionally vulnerable to small fragments," Dr. Ward said.

Other lessons:

Finally, because of the nature of modern weaponry, ocular injuries often are bilateral. More than half of all eye injuries (57%) are caused by improvised explosive devices (IEDs). The remaining injuries were caused by rocket-propelled grenades, gunshot wounds, mortar and shrapnel, land mines, and other causes.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times)  ASCRS 2025: Joaquin De Rojas, MD, leverages machine learning model to predict arcuate outcomes
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: AnnMarie Hipsley, DPT, PhD, presents VESA for biomechanical simulation of presbyopia progression
Shehzad Batliwala, DO, aka Dr. Shehz, discussed humanitarian ophthalmology and performing refractive surgery in low-resource, high-risk areas at the ASCRS Foundation Symposium.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Advancing vitreous care with Inder Paul Singh, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The Residency Report: Study provides new insights into USH2A target end points
Lisa Nijm, MD, says preoperative osmolarity testing can manage patient expectations and improve surgical results at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
At the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting, Weijie Violet Lin, MD, ABO, shares highlights from a 5-year review of cross-linking complications
Maanasa Indaram, MD, is the medical director of the pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus division at University of California San Francisco, and spoke about corneal crosslinking (CXL) at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Taylor Strange, DO, assesses early visual outcomes with femto-created arcuate incisions in premium IOL cases
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, shares her early clinical experience with the Unity VCS system
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.