"It was a devastating blow," she said.
Under House rules, the members would have to find enough cuts in other parts of the government budget to compensate for the cost of this bill-now a much more daunting task.
"It's not clear how they will find 'pay-fors' but they will look," Cohen said.
The Republicans said they could cut some of the $10 billion allocated in the health-care reform legislation for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI), but Cohen predicted the Democrats would never agree to that.
"Hopefully, we don't get caught in a partisan fight over this," she said.
Democrats in the Senate hope to use some of the war funding saved by President Obama's planned troop withdrawal from Iraq to solve the SGR crisis.
However, the Republicans will resist any cut in military funding, she explained.
"One of the biggest challenges is finding a bipartisan offset for this fix," Cohen said. "Nobody wants to add to the deficit."
The AAO, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS), and other physicians' groups had hoped that the bipartisan Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (the "super committee") would find a way to replace the SGR as part of its massive overhaul of the budget.
The failure of that effort in late November set in motion a set of mandatory, across-the-board budget cuts to begin in 2013.
Under those cuts, Medicare provider fees would be cut about 2%, with additional cuts to payments for graduate medical education, Cohen said.
"We'd rather any cuts be done surgically," she said, with cuts made to imaging services.
The groups worked to block a Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) proposal to replace the SGR with a payment structure that would freeze payments to primary-care physicians and health-care professionals over 10 years, while reducing payments to all other physicians by 5.9% per year between 2012 and 2014. Following that period, payment rates to specialists-including ophthalmologists- would be frozen for 7 years.
They won support from 94 representatives, who argued in a Nov. 16 letter to House leaders that such a plan would cause specialists to reduce the number of Medicare patients they treat and threaten access to care. It also would erase the work by numerous physicians' groups-including AAO-to lead and support outcomes-based initiatives designed to improve care and lower costs.
"Simply put, MedPAC's recommendation fails to value the role that all providers have in the continuum of care, and, if implemented, the impact on access to care for millions of Americans would be devastating," states the letter, signed by 56 Republican and 38 Democrat representatives.