Medical research funding faces possible budget delay

May 15, 2008

Increasing the funding for the National Eye Institute is one of the goals of non-profit advocacy coalition National Alliance for Eye and Vision Research and its education affiliate, the Alliance for Eye and Vision Research. The organizations, however, do not expect the budget for fiscal year 2009 to be finalized until February, after the presidential election.

Key Points

Fort Lauderdale, FL-Making the case for an increase in National Eye Institute (NEI) funding is one of the goals of non-profit advocacy coalition National Alliance for Eye and Vision Research (NAEVR) and its education affiliate, the Alliance for Eye and Vision Research (AEVR). The organizations, however, do not expect the budget for fiscal year 2009 to be finalized until February, after the presidential election, said James Jorkasky, NAEVR/AEVR executive director. He made his remarks at a briefing held by the groups during the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

"Congress would rather wait until after the election and see what happens then," Jorkasky said. The timing of the budget approval is important, he added, because until financial resources are certain, the governmental bodies that distribute medical research funding will proceed cautiously in allocating their current funds, and this caution will affect research and employment at the various institutions that receive funding from the government.

NAEVR, based in Rockville, MD, is asking Congress to increase both the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and NEI budgets by 6.6%, which represents the biomedical inflation rate of 3.6% plus 3% to begin compensating for the 18% loss in purchasing power over the previous five funding cycles, Jorkasky said. This percentage would equate to a $1.9 billion increase for the NIH and a $44 million increase for the NEI over fiscal year 2008 levels of funding. The Senate passed an amendment 95-4 in support of a funding increase, and 179 members of the House have signed a letter in support of the proposed increase, he said.

Regarding the presidential primary and election, Jorkasky said that the American Association for the Advancement of Science and other organizations continue to push for a medical research-specific debate during the election process. Also, he said, Research!America has launched a Web site, http://www.yourcandidatesyourhealth.org/, which features presidential candidates' responses to a questionnaire about topics related to health and medical research. NAEVR/AEVR will be working with Research!America to promote the site, Jorkasky said.

Other efforts

Other initiatives being undertaken by NAEVR/AEVR, he said, include assisting the NEI in efforts to collaborate further with the FDA, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; conducting congressional briefings and education, including an update to the Research!America/NAEVR fact sheet; creating a separate fact sheet about diseases of the aging eye; and expanding efforts to increase Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of Veterans' Affairs research programs, especially as relates to traumatic brain injury and its effects.

Numerous opportunities exist for potential funding through the DOD, Jorkasky said. Congress seems especially interested in translational research, which can be applied quickly to active military personnel, he added.

"We've learned a lot from the military setting that gets applied to the civilian setting," Jorkasky said, adding that research on combat-related traumatic brain injury might be applicable to civilians involved in car accidents.