Article

Many factors have impact on treatment efficacy for amblyopia

While treatment for amblyopia is effective, there is no consensus as to what treatment works best. There are a number of factors that have an impact on treatment efficacy, according to Bruce Furr, CO. He discussed these factors Sunday at the American Academy of Ophthalmology annual meeting.

Chicago-While treatment for amblyopia is effective, there is no consensus as to what treatment works best. There are a number of factors that have an impact on treatment efficacy, according to Bruce Furr, CO. He discussed these factors Sunday at the American Academy of Ophthalmology annual meeting.

“There is no consensus on the efficacy of which treatment method works best for amblyopia or what defines success,” he said.

Evidence regarding the type of amblyopia and the effect on visual outcome is mixed; two studies showed that outcomes differed depending on the amblyopia type, with pure anisometropic amblyopes faring better than those with strabismus and combined types. Patient compliance seems to be a critical determinant of the visual acuity outcome. An analysis of age at presentation does not seem to affect the final visual acuity outcome, according to Furr, who is from the Ida Lucy Iacobucci Orthoptic Clinic, University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor.

Refractive error status has a strong correlation with the initial visual acuity and outcome in these patients, and that the higher the refractive error, the more aggressive the treatment should be. The combining of visual activities with treatment does not seem to produce a useful visual effect. Finally, abrupt discontinuation of treatment produces greater regression than weaning patients off of occlusion therapy.

“Amblyopia treatment seems to work,” Furr said. “A significant number of patients treated with any of the methods improved, whether the improvement is based on the lines of vision gained or the percentage of vision gained relative to the initial difference between the two eyes.”

Most clinicians prefer the use of patching therapy and then atropine after patching.

“Vision improvement can occur with any type of treatment for any type of functional amblyopia regardless of the age of the patient,” Furr said. “We must treat amblyopia when we see it, employ our best methods, and hope for active treatment compliance to achieve the best result for the most patients.”

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times)  ASCRS 2025: Joaquin De Rojas, MD, leverages machine learning model to predict arcuate outcomes
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: AnnMarie Hipsley, DPT, PhD, presents VESA for biomechanical simulation of presbyopia progression
Shehzad Batliwala, DO, aka Dr. Shehz, discussed humanitarian ophthalmology and performing refractive surgery in low-resource, high-risk areas at the ASCRS Foundation Symposium.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Advancing vitreous care with Inder Paul Singh, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The Residency Report: Study provides new insights into USH2A target end points
Lisa Nijm, MD, says preoperative osmolarity testing can manage patient expectations and improve surgical results at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
At the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting, Weijie Violet Lin, MD, ABO, shares highlights from a 5-year review of cross-linking complications
Maanasa Indaram, MD, is the medical director of the pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus division at University of California San Francisco, and spoke about corneal crosslinking (CXL) at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Taylor Strange, DO, assesses early visual outcomes with femto-created arcuate incisions in premium IOL cases
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, shares her early clinical experience with the Unity VCS system
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.