Article

Less spectacle dependence should be expectation of bilateral multifocal lens implantation

Less spectacle dependence, not spectacle independence, should be the expectation after bilateral implantation of multifocal IOLs, said David F. Chang, MD, of Altos Eye Physicians, Los Altos, CA.

Less spectacle dependence, not spectacle independence, should be the expectation after bilateral implantation of multifocal IOLs, said David F. Chang, MD, of Altos Eye Physicians, Los Altos, CA.

He conducted a prospective, non-randomized study comparing real-world multifocal lens performance after bilateral implantation of either a second-generation refractive IOL (ReZoom, Advanced Medical Optics) or an apodized diffractive lens (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon Laboratories) and reported 6-month data here. Results for 15 consecutive patients receiving each lens were compared.

"What I think is a little unique about this study is that I limited the people who were under the age of 70, thinking these would be the people who were more demanding in their visual tasks-out at night, using the computer, and what not," Dr. Chang said.

Patients were not randomly assigned to receive either lens "because I wanted to at least try to pick the lens that I thought would best match the needs of that patient by understanding their differences," he said.

The study found that "both of these lenses do what they set out to do, improving uncorrected vision compared with a monofocal, with good lifestyle evaluation and satisfaction," Dr. Chang said. Results "give the edge" to the refractive lens for distance vision, he added, and "a clearer edge" to the diffractive lens for near vision.

The lenses performed similarly for intermediate vision, but 25% of patients in both groups continued wearing glasses for computer use, "so I wouldn't say either group has excellent intermediate vision, at least in my patient population," Dr. Chang said.

The diffractive lens was associated with less-severe halo.

The study found that 50% to 70% of patients continued using glasses for something after lens implantation.

"That tells me that the expectation has to be decreased spectacle dependence, and if it is, that's 70% of people who are happy," he said.

Dr. Chang's paper was named the best of the session in which it was presented (2-L, Intraocular Surgery: Multifocal IOLs). Dr. Chang is a consultant to Alcon, AMO, and Visiogen.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Mark Lobanoff, MD, on making the move to office-based surgery
Barsha Lal, PhD, discusses the way low dose atropine affects accommodative amplitude and dynamics at the 2025 ARVO meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: When eye findings should prompt neuroimaging in suspected neuro-Behcet disease
At the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) meeting, Katherine Talcott, MD, a retina specialist at Cleveland Clinic, shared her findings on EYP-1901 (EyePoint Pharmaceuticals) in the phase 2 DAVIO study.
Dr. Jogin Desai, founder of Eyestem Research, discusses his research at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Michael Rivers, MD, shares his takeaways as a panelist at the inaugural SightLine event
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Karl Stonecipher, MD, on LASIK outcomes using an aspheric excimer laser for high myopia
John Tan talks about an emergency triage framework for retinal artery occlusion at the 2025 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) meeting.
Dr Robert Maloney at the 2025 Controversies in Modern Eye Care meeting
Wendy Lee, MD, MS, at Controversies in Modern Eye Care 2025.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.