Article

IOL power calculation in post-laser refractive eyes to be easier

A new tool for pseudophakic IOL power calculation in post-laser refractive surgery eyes will help cataract surgeons provide more accurate refractive outcomes.

Key Points

Dr. Hoffer collaborated with Giacomo Savini, MD, Bologna, Italy, in creating this tool. It is a project that grew out of meetings of the IOL Power Club, an organization formed to develop new solutions for enhancing IOL power calculations and for defining guidelines from evidence-based medicine.

The tool being developed is a one-page spreadsheet that will allow entry of all the biometric data necessary for the large number of methods that have been published for estimated K readings and IOL power adjustment. It then automatically calculates those values and provides recommendations of which K reading to use and also on the most advisable IOL power.

"Everyone who does cataract surgery knows that IOL power calculation in eyes that have undergone laser vision correction is a challenge because we cannot measure the true corneal power and the index of refraction of the cornea has changed. Many methods have been proposed to overcome those problems, but the question arises of which is the right one to use. Often, the surgeon winds up falling back on the easiest approach," said Dr. Hoffer, clinical professor of ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, and a private practitioner in Santa Monica, CA.

"With this spreadsheet, the surgeon still needs to know what data to collect," Dr. Hoffer said. "The spreadsheet clues you to what is needed, and after the information is entered, the program will eliminate the need for pencil and paper because it does all of the calculations automatically. In addition, by allowing all of the data collected preoperatively and postoperatively to be recorded in a single, printable sheet, it also has a potential benefit for medicolegal purposes if documentation ever becomes necessary."

Two sections

Dr. Hoffer explained that the spreadsheet is divided into two sections based on the two basic methods proposed. One section includes formulae for estimating true corneal power and the other includes methods for adjusting the target IOL power. Within each of those sections, the formulae are subcategorized further into those that require historical clinical biometric data and those that can be used with the patient's current data. It also lists aphakic refraction methods that do not require any preoperative biometric data, but depend on performing refraction in or out of the OR after the cataract is removed.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Dilsher Dhoot, MD, on the evolution of geographic atrophy therapy: where are we now?
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times Europe) Anat Loewenstein, MD, shares insights on the real-world results of remote retinal imaging
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Two-wavelength autofluorescence for macular xanthophyll carotenoids with Christine Curcio, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) FLIO and the brain: Making the invisible visible with Robert Sergott, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Structure-function correlates using high-res OCT images with Karl Csaky, MD, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) SriniVas Sadda, MD, on high-res OCT of atrophic and precursor lesions in AMD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Christine Curcio, PhD, shares histology update supporting review software and revised nomenclature for <3 μm OCT
1 expert is featured in this series.
1 expert is featured in this series.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.