OR WAIT null SECS
A portable device for detecting multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials associated with visual field stimulation is being developed as an objective test for identifying glaucoma-related visual function loss.
By Cheryl Guttman Krader; Reviewed by Felipe A. Medeiros, MD, PhD
A portable brain-computer interface (nGoggle) is encouraging for objective assessment of visual function loss in patients with glaucoma, said Felipe A. Medeiros, MD, PhD, professor of ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
The platform, developed by Dr. Medeiros and colleagues, assesses visual function loss using multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (mfSSVEPs) associated with visual field stimulation.
The head-mounted unit integrates electroencephalography (EEG) with a cell phone-based display that appears in virtual reality-type goggles. The EEG uses dry electrodes positioned over the occipital region, and the goggles incorporate foam-based electro-oculogram sensors to assess eye movements, recognizing that fixation loss could affect the test results.
“Our brain-based objective method is completely portable and transmits data wirelessly through the network to an operating tablet or directly to the cloud via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi,” Dr. Medeiros said.
In initial testing, it demonstrated greater accuracy compared with standard automated perimetry (SAP) for discriminating eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy versus healthy eyes. In another study, the device was able to detect damage in eyes with preperimetric glaucoma, he noted.
“We are currently investigating its potential for longitudinal monitoring of glaucoma damage,” Dr. Medeiros said.
Initial evaluation of the technology was performed using a prototype device in a case-controlled study that included 62 eyes of 33 glaucoma patients and 30 eyes of 17 healthy individuals. Glaucoma patients had relatively mild disease (average mean deviation ~–4 dB), and 11 of the 62 glaucomatous eyes had preperimetric disease.
For the testing, the field of view was divided into 20 sectors, each flickering at a specific frequency. Global and sectoral mfSSVEPs were compared with global and sectoral SAP parameters.
Results showed the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the brain-computer interface was 0.924, and it was significantly larger (better performance) than the SAP parameters used as comparators (mean deviation, 0.81; mean sensitivity, 0.80; pattern standard deviation, 0.77), Dr. Medeiros noted.
Although eyes with preperimetric glaucoma had no evidence of visual function loss on SAP, they exhibited decreased mfSSVEP responses compared with healthy controls (0.280 versus 0.334). Sectors of visual function loss with the device corresponded with those identified on SAP. Thinner measurements on spectral domain-optical coherence tomography also corresponded to lower amplitudes on the mfSSVEP, he added.
The technology has potential applications beyond assessment of glaucomatous visual function loss, he noted.
“The device could potentially be used for assessing higher cognitive functioning by creating virtual reality tasks and monitoring brain activity through EEG,” Dr. Medeiros said.
Felipe A. Medeiros, MD, PhD
This article was adapted from Dr. Medeiros’ presentation at the 2017 meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Dr. Medeiros is a co-founder of nGoggle Inc. Dr. Medeiros is also a consultant and has received research support from Carl Zeiss Meditec and Heidelberg Engineering.