Article

Honesty is still the best policy

The right thing to do is rarely the easiest option.

I can recall medical school courses such as Doctoring 101, where the framework of patient-centered care was taught to first-and second-year medical students. We were naïve in our patient-care skills, but supremely confident that we could learn to provide thoughtful, open, and 100% honest care.

There were role-playing sessions in which we handled different patient personalities, dealt with patients of different religious beliefs, chose the right empathic words to say to a family experiencing the loss of a loved one, or said "I'm sorry" in cases of an undesirable medical or surgical outcome. We knew it was the right thing to do,1 and it was the required thing to do.2 By the time we hit the wards, we were ready to be expert communicators.

In the real world, we are often quick to come up with many persuasive justifications to avoid full disclosure:

In addition, adverse outcomes lead to fears of lawsuits. Suddenly, admitting to a medical error, or even apologizing, seemed a bit more dangerous-an implied admission of guilt. Finally, there was the occasional doctor still holding on to the days of paternalistic, doctor-knows-best, medicine.

With time and experience, we learned to manage this tension (though the thought of a lawsuit still scares us all), and strove to uphold the principles of Doctoring 101. In today's litigious climate, we also learned (and studies have shown3 ) that deceit on the part of the physician leads to anger on the part of the patient, with a lawsuit more likely to follow soon after.

On the other hand, effective and respectful communication-including listening to patients-increases the chances that patients will understand that accidents happen; they will appreciate the truth, and, we hope, forgive.

Look around your hospital-how does this tension play out? Is there a disparity between what we know to be right and what is actually done?

How well has the Fusarium keratitis outbreak been handled? With the investigation ongoing, we all have an opportunity to analyze how the principles of patient-centered care, and the rules of open and honest communication, apply to large corporations.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
Shehzad Batliwala, DO, aka Dr. Shehz, discussed humanitarian ophthalmology and performing refractive surgery in low-resource, high-risk areas at the ASCRS Foundation Symposium.
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Advancing vitreous care with Inder Paul Singh, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) The Residency Report: Study provides new insights into USH2A target end points
Lisa Nijm, MD, says preoperative osmolarity testing can manage patient expectations and improve surgical results at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
At the 2025 ASCRS Annual Meeting, Weijie Violet Lin, MD, ABO, shares highlights from a 5-year review of cross-linking complications
Maanasa Indaram, MD, is the medical director of the pediatric ophthalmology and adult strabismus division at University of California San Francisco, and spoke about corneal crosslinking (CXL) at the 2025 ASCRS annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Taylor Strange, DO, assesses early visual outcomes with femto-created arcuate incisions in premium IOL cases
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, shares her early clinical experience with the Unity VCS system
Patricia Buehler, MD, MPH, founder and CEO of Osheru, talks about the Ziplyft device for noninvasive blepharoplasty at the 2025 American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ASCRS) annual meeting
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Bonnie An Henderson, MD, on leveraging artificial intelligence in cataract refractive surgery
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.