Article

Fixation preference testing deemed inaccurate by researchers

Fixation preference testing for detecting amblyopia in infants and toddlers is unreliable, according to researchers.

Baltimore-Fixation preference testing for detecting amblyopia in infants and toddlers is unreliable, according to researchers.

Among 53 older children with two or more normal lines of intraocular difference according to testing with standard HOTV eye charts, 46 were graded as normal or likely normal in fixation preference testing, reported David S. Friedman, MD, PhD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University, and colleagues in the October issue of Ophthalmology.

"This result is worrisome to the clinician because [fixation preference testing] is the only widely available test for children unable to perform optotype acuity," wrote researchers.

A visual acuity survey in Baltimore, which is where the findings emerged, intended to evaluate more than 2,500 children aged 6 to 71 months with multiple tests including fixation preference testing.

Dr. Friedman and colleagues concluded that the test "does not identify accurately preschool children with two lines or more of interocular difference in presenting visual acuity."

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Inside NYEE’s new refractive solutions center with Kira Manusis, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Dilsher Dhoot, MD, on the evolution of geographic atrophy therapy: where are we now?
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times Europe) Anat Loewenstein, MD, shares insights on the real-world results of remote retinal imaging
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Two-wavelength autofluorescence for macular xanthophyll carotenoids with Christine Curcio, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) FLIO and the brain: Making the invisible visible with Robert Sergott, MD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Structure-function correlates using high-res OCT images with Karl Csaky, MD, PhD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) SriniVas Sadda, MD, on high-res OCT of atrophic and precursor lesions in AMD
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Christine Curcio, PhD, shares histology update supporting review software and revised nomenclature for <3 μm OCT
1 expert is featured in this series.
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.