
|Articles|May 1, 2003
Exposures of porous orbital implants can be avoided
In the past decade, porous orbital implants have become the implant of choice for many surgeons managing the anophthalmic socket after enucleation or evisceration. By permitting fibrovascular ingrowth, these porous implants are better able to resist infection, migration, and extrusion when compared with acrylic or silicone implants.
Advertisement
Newsletter
Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.
SubscribeAdvertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Eye Care Network - Ophthalmology Times
1
FDA grants RMAT designation to Emmecell's EO2002 for corneal endothelial disease
2
Opus Genetics reaches FDA alignment on phase 3 registrational design for OPGx-LCA5 gene therapy
3
NeuroOp Guru: What a big data study reveals about NAION and stroke risk
4
Port Delivery System Therapies in Retinal Vascular Diseases
5






















