
Everything you thought you knew about astigmatism and dry eye is wrong
Editor’s Note: Welcome to “
Conventional wisdom is that an unstable tear film in patients with
appear to have more cylinder than it actually does.
Once treated, the ocular surface should be smoother, and the patient will therefore have less astigmatism.
Read the first installment:
Or, at least that’s how I thought it worked. But in a study I recently conducted, 52% of eyes had a higher magnitude of astigmatism when measured six weeks after treatment with thermal pulsation therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) than before treatment (Figure 1).
We were unable to predict the magnitude or direction of the cylinder change based on the baseline pre-treatment keratometry. That’s why it is so important to treat the underlying MGD before performing biometry and
Read the second installment:
Results
For this study, I evaluated keratometry, refractive error, and other measures at baseline and six weeks after a single thermal pulsation treatment (LipiFlow, Johnson & Johnson Vision) in patients with MGD who were scheduled for subsequent
The post-thermal pulsation biometry was used to calculate IOL power and determine my approach to astigmatism management (toric
Finally, the actual refractive results were compared with those I would have obtained had I relied on the pre-treatment biometry.
Related:
It turned out that 56% of eyes had less residual refractive astigmatism (better outcomes) after surgery than they would have had if they had undergone cataract surgery without having the LipiFlow treatment first (Figure 2).
This is good evidence that treating MGD is important for optimal results during cataract surgery. Moreover, it cannot be presumed the “true” astigmatism will always be less than what we see with an unstable tear film.
Newsletter
Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.