• COVID-19
  • Biosimilars
  • Cataract Therapeutics
  • DME
  • Gene Therapy
  • Workplace
  • Ptosis
  • Optic Relief
  • Imaging
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • AMD
  • Presbyopia
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Practice Management
  • Pediatrics
  • Surgery
  • Therapeutics
  • Optometry
  • Retina
  • Cataract
  • Pharmacy
  • IOL
  • Dry Eye
  • Understanding Antibiotic Resistance
  • Refractive
  • Cornea
  • Glaucoma
  • OCT
  • Ocular Allergy
  • Clinical Diagnosis
  • Technology

Back to the straight phaco tip


Historically, surgeons performed phacoemulsification with a straight-tip handpiece.

Reducing trauma to endothelial cells

There are a number of factors that are known to influence the trauma to endothelial cells during phacoemulsification. These include longer surgery time, longer absolute phacoemulsification time, higher ultrasound energy, and denser cataracts.1 Most of these are related to surgical technique and are influenced by the surgical platform used. I have found a number of advantages with a proprietary phacoemulsification platform (WhiteStar Signature with Ellips FX Transversal Ultrasound Technology, Abbott Medical Optics [AMO]).

During quadrant removal, a straight tip can be positioned bevel down easily by spinning the phaco handpiece between the surgeon's fingers, thus directing the energy posteriorly rather than anteriorly. This type of maneuver is awkward with a curved tip. Not only do curved tips take up more space in the anterior chamber, forcing the surgeon to position the phaco needle more anteriorly, but they also are difficult to position bevel down. In a subjective review of patients' corneas after phacoemulsification with a straight tip, I noticed clearer corneas. I believe this is due to the fact that a straight tip requires less working space in the anterior chamber, resulting in less endothelial cell damage and therefore less 1-day postoperative edema.

© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.