Article

Automated lens finishing is state of the art

Industrial robots—computer-controlled machines that lift, place, move, or perform specific tasks—have been performing repetitive and even dangerous jobs for several decades. Examples of such machines are found in automobile production lines, spraying paints, transporting assemblies between workstations, and welding frames and bodies with great speed, accuracy, and repeatability.

Industrial robots-computer-controlled machines that lift, place, move, or perform specific tasks-have been performing repetitive and even dangerous jobs for several decades. Examples of such machines are found in automobile production lines, spraying paints, transporting assemblies between workstations, and welding frames and bodies with great speed, accuracy, and repeatability.

Boosting efficiency

Before investing in industrial lens robotics, one needs a sense of perspective. According to Steve Swalgen, national director-lab business for Santinelli International of Hauppauge, NY, retail-scale lens machines are capable of handling 20 to 30 jobs (pairs of lenses) per day. An industrial machine, on the other hand, will complete 150 to 250 jobs in a day. Additionally, such a machine is designed to operate 24 hours per day, 7 days per week where needed.

Moreover, wholesale industrial-grade equipment tends to be designed stronger than their retail counterparts, with added durability that's crucial to steady production flow and reduced waste costs because of a stoppage in the middle of a process.

Swalgen emphasized, "You can't have downtime."

Certainly not in the case of Wal-Mart's four U.S. labs, with total production throughput averaging 20,000 to 25,000 jobs per week.

Another example is the lab supporting San Antonio, TX-based Eye Care Centers of America Inc. (ECCA). While many of the company's stores can provide "lenses in 1 hour" service, ECCA also operates a lab in Schertz, TX, that has seven automated and five non-automated machines.

According to Brian Gamble, ECCA lab manager, the first automated machine was installed in December 2003, with several more added over the next few months. In the ensuing 2 years, the lab has doubled its edging capacity without affecting the size of the labor force. The machines handle about 85% of the frame sizes that come through the lab. Most of the remaining 15% of the orders have high minus or high plus values that exceed the clearance capacity of the automated equipment, thus justifying the retention of employees skilled on the manual edge finishing machines.

Newsletter

Don’t miss out—get Ophthalmology Times updates on the latest clinical advancements and expert interviews, straight to your inbox.

Related Videos
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Taylor Strange, DO, assesses early visual outcomes with femto-created arcuate incisions in premium IOL cases
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Neda Shamie, MD, shares her early clinical experience with the Unity VCS system
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Bonnie An Henderson, MD, on leveraging artificial intelligence in cataract refractive surgery
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Gregory Moloney, FRANZO, FRCSC, on rotational stability
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Steven J. Dell, MD, reports 24-month outcomes for shape-changing IOL
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) ASCRS 2025: Parag Majmudar, MD, on bridging the gap between residency and real-world practice
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Oluwatosin U. Smith talks Glaukomtecken
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Inside ASCRS 2025: Francis S. Mah, MD, takes the helm with a vision for research, education, and advocacy
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) NeuroOp Guru: Cranial nerve six palsy with chemosis is a critical clue to cavernous carotid fistula
(Image credit: Ophthalmology Times) Neda Shamie_Controversies in Modern Eye Care 2025
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.