OR WAIT null SECS
A variety of techniques has been introduced for the surgical management of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS). Method selection may be based on preoperative assessment of IFIS severity, although these cases may be unpredictable and surgeons need to be equipped to use a range of alternatives to enable a safe outcome.
New Orleans-Cases of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) encompass a wide spectrum of severity, so it is important for surgeons to master several different strategies to increase the likelihood of achieving a safe outcome in these eyes, said David F. Chang, MD, speaking at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
"Severe IFIS can sometimes present as an unpredictable intraoperative surprise and is always a true challenge when it is unforeseen. Therefore, surgeons need to be prepared to use a staged approach employing complementary strategies and recognizing that some excellent techniques don't necessarily work in all eyes," said Dr. Chang, clinical professor of ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco.
As another tip, Dr. Chang noted that he will complete nuclear chopping in-the-bag before removing the chopped fragments to delay using aspiration and ultrasound power for as long as possible. Intracameral epinephrine, with or without preoperative topical atropine, constitutes a pharmacologic strategy for achieving adequate pupil dilation and reducing iris billowing and the tendency for prolapse. In addition to being used as a primary measure, it can be supplemented intraoperatively with the addition of the OVD to further widen the pupil, and it represents a good rescue strategy in a case that has proceeded to a point where placement of iris retractors would be difficult, Dr. Chang said.
"Used as an initial strategy, intracameral epinephrine may be most helpful in eyes where IFIS is mild to moderate in severity as judged by having a 5-to 7-mm preoperative pupil diameter. It may be worth trying in a more severe case, and surgeons should recognize that those pupils can take 20 to 30 seconds to respond," he commented.
Dr. Chang credited Richard Packard, MD, and David Allen, MD, with first introducing the use of an intracameral alpha-agonist. Although those surgeons in the United Kingdom used phenylephrine, an epinephrine-based formulation for use by U.S. surgeons was popularized by Joel K. Shugar, MD, that involves mixing bisulfite-free epinephrine with balanced salt solution (BSS) or another sterile intraocular irrigating solution (BSS Plus, Alcon Laboratories) in a 1:3 or 1:4 dilution.
"The alpha-agonist acts directly on the receptors of the iris dilator muscle to increase tone and restore the normal iris rigidity that we are accustomed to seeing in surgery involving non-IFIS cases," said Dr. Chang.
Iris retractors and pupil expansion rings also can be used from the outset of surgery and offer surgeons a safe and reliably effective method for preventing pupil constriction during surgery.
"These devices can also be inserted later in the case, if necessary. However, it is clearly preferable to decide about their use early, prior to completing capsulorhexis and hydrodissection, when placement easier," Dr. Chang said.
"One advantage is that surgeons can use high vacuum and their usual OVD without any concerns that the pupil will constrict unexpectedly," he added. "And since the pupil in an IFIS eye is elastic and not fibrotic, the pupil can usually be maximally stretched without damage and will return to its normal shape after the retractors are removed."
Dr. Chang said that he likes to use 4-0 polypropylene retractors in the diamond configuration described by Thomas A. Oetting, MD, and Luis C. Omphroy, MD (J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:596-598). Compared with 6-0 nylon, the 4-0 polypropylene is much stiffer, and so manipulation of the 4-0 polypropylene iris retractors is much easier in terms of hooking the iris, he said. The advantage of the diamond configuration is that it pulls the iris down behind the clear corneal phaco incision and out of the way of the phaco tip, he said.
"Cost-effectiveness is another advantage of the 4-0 [polypropylene] iris retractors, as they are sturdy enough to be autoclaved and so are reusable," Dr. Chang said. He also mentioned that a pupil expansion ring (Malyugin Ring, MicroSurgical Technology) designed by Russian ophthalmologist Boris Malyugin, MD, appears to be a great new tool for use in IFIS cases. The device is constructed of 5-0 polypropylene, and it is very easy to insert using its dedicated injector system. The injector system is disposable, loads automatically, and also is used for removing the ring at the end of the case.
"Use of this system reliably achieves a 6-mm-round pupil opening that cannot come down during the case," Dr. Chang said. "The collapsible design and thin profile minimizes the risk of hitting the cornea that is present with stiffer and thicker plastic expansion rings"