• COVID-19
  • Biosimilars
  • Cataract Therapeutics
  • DME
  • Gene Therapy
  • Workplace
  • Ptosis
  • Optic Relief
  • Imaging
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • AMD
  • Presbyopia
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Practice Management
  • Pediatrics
  • Surgery
  • Therapeutics
  • Optometry
  • Retina
  • Cataract
  • Pharmacy
  • IOL
  • Dry Eye
  • Understanding Antibiotic Resistance
  • Refractive
  • Cornea
  • Glaucoma
  • OCT
  • Ocular Allergy
  • Clinical Diagnosis
  • Technology

Address diabetic retinopathy by treating underlying disease


For now, the most effective way to prevent or manage diabetic retinopathy remains taking a proactive approach to controlling blood glucose levels and hypertension in patients.

Key Points

Editor's Note: Part one of Ophthalmology Times' in-depth look at diabetic retinopathy, in the Sept. 15, 2009 issue (see Accumulating evidence provides encouraging data with inserter), examined screening techniques and technologies. Part two, here, explores management, follow-up, and research into pharmaceutical approaches to treatment.

Clinical trials and observational studies have found that proper management of blood glucose levels and, to a lesser extent, blood pressure, can delay or even halt the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

A physician can monitor blood glucose control by measuring the patient's glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Within red blood cells, glucose molecules bind with hemoglobin to form HbA1c, levels of which indicate the average level of glucose to which the cell has been exposed over its life cycle. HbA1c levels typically are around 4% to 5.9% in healthy individuals, but they can be much higher in patients with diabetes, because of prolonged periods of hyperglycemia.

Unfortunately, research has shown that therapeutic targets for glycosylated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and cholesterol-the three most important categories of management-are reached in only about 7% of patients with diabetes.2 Thus, in diagnosing diabetes, ophthalmologists should measure the blood pressure of overweight patients, check for ankle swelling, and relay any abnormalities to patients' physicians.3 Also, patients with type 2 diabetes should be reminded to watch their caloric intake and to exercise, and patients with type 1 diabetes should be reminded to monitor their blood glucose levels and insulin intake.

Seemingly minute differences in disease management can have a drastic effect on the microvascular complications of patients with diabetes, and patients in whom blood glucose levels are adequately controlled have a substantially reduced risk of developing DR.4 Results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial showed that patients aged 13 to 39 years with either no retinopathy or mild to moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR) who received intensive insulin treatment were much less likely to experience a worsening of ocular complications than those who received conventional insulin treatment. At the 3.5-year follow-up, those in the conventional treatment group, who received one or two daily insulin injections, had more than a five-fold greater risk of disease progression than those who received intensive treatment with shots of insulin at least three times a day based on self blood-glucose monitoring.5 Likewise, in the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy, researchers found that elevated glycosylated hemoglobin levels were associated with more severe retinopathy in patients with younger-onset or older-onset disease.6,7

Management of blood pressure also may have a direct effect on the course of ocular complications in those with diabetes. In a study of adolescents with type 1 diabetes, researchers found that a 10-mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure was associated with a 3% to 20% higher risk of retinopathy, and a 10-mm Hg increase in diastolic blood pressure was associated with a 2% to 30% higher risk of retinopathy.8

The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy also found a link between higher blood pressure and increased risk of DR progression, but the difference was only marginally significant and may have been due to increased morbidity (myocardial infarction, stroke, and nephropathy) as well as morbidity.9 Evidence of nephropathy, in the form of proteinuria, also was associated with an increased risk for DR progression, likely because of the shared role of microvascular damage among the two conditions.

© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.